AIDB Daily Papers
JOR-Bench:大規模言語モデルのための日本語オペレーションズ・リサーチ・ベンチマーク
※ 日本語タイトル・ポイントはAIによる自動生成です。正確な内容は原論文をご確認ください。
ポイント
- 大規模言語モデルのオペレーションズ・リサーチ問題の定式化および解決能力を評価するための5つの日本語ベンチマークコレクションを構築した。
- ソルバーに依存せず、日本語の問題文と数値解のペアを用いて複数モデルの性能を横断的に評価できる点が新しい。
- 強力な多言語モデルでは定式化能力が言語中立的である一方、プロンプトが日本語の場合に特有のエラーが生じることを明らかにした。
Abstract
We present JOR-Bench, a collection of five Japanese-language benchmarks for evaluating the ability of large language models (LLMs) to formulate and solve operations research (OR) problems. Each benchmark is a Japanese translation of an existing English benchmark: IndustryOR, MAMO Complex LP, NL4OPT, OptiBench, and OptMATH, covering 1,319 problems spanning linear programming, mixed-integer programming, non-linear programming, and combinatorial optimization. JOR-Bench is a solver-independent benchmark that can be used with any solver or programming language, and consists of pairs of Japanese problem statements and expected numerical answers. We evaluate seven LLMs, including multilingual general-purpose models and Japanese-specialized models, on both the original English and the new Japanese versions, and compare performance across languages. For the main evaluation, we standardize execution with the Python interface to OR-Tools to make model outputs comparable and reproducible with open-source software. Our results show that OR formulation ability is largely language-neutral for strong multilingual models; the overall average accuracy difference between English and Japanese is only $-0.3$ pp. Yet error analysis reveals subtle cross-lingual differences, including a pragmatic disambiguation failure in some domains that causes models to output decision-variable values instead of the objective value when the prompt is in Japanese.
Paper AI Chat
この論文のPDF全文を対象にAIに質問できます。
質問の例: