AIDB Daily Papers
実世界設定における長期記憶ベンチマーク「DynamicMem」
※ 日本語タイトル・ポイントはAIによる自動生成です。正確な内容は原論文をご確認ください。
ポイント
- 実世界でのLLMエージェントの長期記憶能力を評価するため、15ヶ月間のマルチアプリ活動データを構築した新しいベンチマークを提案する。
- 既存のベンチマークでは捉えきれない、異種混在するプロファイルの変化、外部要因による変化、証拠の散在といった現実的な行動特性を再現する。
- 5つの代表的なシステムを評価した結果、記憶の検索能力が性能低下の主な原因であり、記憶システム自体の改善が重要であることが明らかになった。
Abstract
LLM agents increasingly act as personal assistants that must remember a user's profile over months: who they are (attributes), what they routinely do (habits), and what they prefer (preferences), and keep it updated as jobs, routines, and tastes drift. Existing benchmarks evaluate this "memory" ability through short, simplified interactions, missing three core properties of real behavior: the profile is heterogeneous, with attributes, habits, and preferences evolving on different timelines; changes are driven by external context such as seasons and life events; and evidence is rarely stated explicitly, instead scattered across many small actions in different apps that a memory system must infer from. We introduce DynamicMem, a synthetic benchmark that constructs 15 months of activity per user, providing long-term multi-app data that real users' privacy keeps out of reach. It provides user-consistent trajectories averaging 2.2M tokens and 1,772 grounded events per user across 16 applications such as e-commerce, fitness, and social platforms. The profile evolves over this period and is never given explicitly: each attribute, habit, or preference must be inferred from small signals scattered across apps. We evaluate at five quarterly checkpoints to track how systems scale as history grows. Benchmarking five representative systems exposes problems a single accuracy score hides: (i) profile reconstruction degrades with history length while service-task accuracy stays flat, despite both drawing on the same memory; (ii) no system both keeps facts that stay true and replaces facts that change, with errors clustering on preferences and on naming the exact referent; and (iii) over 93% of failures trace to what the memory retrieves, not to the model writing the answer, so the largest room for improvement lies in memory itself. Code: https://wenyaxie023.github.io/DynamicMem/
Paper AI Chat
この論文のPDF全文を対象にAIに質問できます。
質問の例: