AIDB Daily Papers
LLM-ADAM:積層造形における印刷前異常検知のための汎用LLMエージェントフレームワーク
※ 日本語タイトル・ポイントはAIによる自動生成です。正確な内容は原論文をご確認ください。
ポイント
- 積層造形(AM)における印刷前のGコード異常を検知する汎用LLMエージェントフレームワークLLM-ADAMを提案した。
- 本研究は、AMのアクセシビリティ向上に伴うユーザーの専門知識不足という課題に対し、Gコードの異常設定を印刷前に検知することで、材料や機械時間の無駄を防ぐ点で重要である。
- 提案フレームワークは、抽出、参照、判定の3つのLLM役割に分解され、既存の単一LLMベースラインと比較して精度を87.5%に向上させた。
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) continues to transform modern manufacturing by enabling flexible, on-demand production of complex geometries across diverse industries. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) has extended AM to laboratories, classrooms, and small production environments, but this accessibility shifts process-planning responsibility to users who may lack manufacturing expertise. A syntactically valid slicer profile can still encode thermally or geometrically harmful settings, and subtle G-code edits can alter extrusion, cooling, or adhesion before a print begins. Pre-print G-code screening catches accidental or adversarial machine-program errors before material or machine time is wasted. This paper proposes LLM-ADAM as a generalizable LLM framework for pre-print anomaly detection in AM. The framework decomposes the task into three roles: Extractor-LLM maps a G-code file to a structured process-parameter schema; Reference-LLM converts printer and material documentation into aligned operating ranges; and Judge-LLM interprets a deterministic deviation table and G-code evidence to decide whether a part is non-defective or belongs to an anomaly class. Printers, materials, and LLM backbones are interchangeable test conditions, not fixed assumptions. We evaluate the framework on an N=200 FFF G-code corpus spanning two desktop printer families, two materials, and five classes including non-defective, under-extrusion, over-extrusion, warping, and stringing. The best framework configuration reaches 87.5% accuracy, compared with 59.5% for the strongest engineered single-LLM baseline. The results show that structured decomposition, rather than backbone strength alone, is the dominant source of improvement, with defect classes identified at or near ceiling for leading configurations while residual errors concentrate on conservative false alarms for non-defective samples.
Paper AI Chat
この論文のPDF全文を対象にAIに質問できます。
質問の例: