次回の更新記事:誤解を招きやすいAI用語6選、技術語なのに揺れる意味(公開予定日:2026年04月30日)
AIDB Daily Papers

LLMエージェントはロボットの認知能力を向上させるか?言語から行動への変換

原題: From Language to Action: Can LLM-Based Agents Be Used for Embodied Robot Cognition?
著者: Shinas Shaji, Fabian Huppertz, Alex Mitrevski, Sebastian Houben
公開日: 2026-03-03 | 分野: LLM 強化学習 ロボティクス 推論 エージェント

※ 日本語タイトル・ポイントはAIによる自動生成です。正確な内容は原論文をご確認ください。

ポイント

  • LLMを組み込んだロボットエージェントの認知アーキテクチャを提案し、計画と実行の推論におけるLLMの可能性を検証した。
  • LLMは高度な言語理解と推論能力を持つが、ロボット制御には高レベル言語と低レベル機能の連携が不可欠であり、その実現が重要となる。
  • シミュレーション環境で物体配置と交換タスクを実施し、LLMエージェントが適応と記憶に基づいた計画能力を示す一方、課題も明らかになった。

Abstract

In order to flexibly act in an everyday environment, a robotic agent needs a variety of cognitive capabilities that enable it to reason about plans and perform execution recovery. Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to demonstrate emergent cognitive aspects, such as reasoning and language understanding; however, the ability to control embodied robotic agents requires reliably bridging high-level language to low-level functionalities for perception and control. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which an LLM can serve as a core component for planning and execution reasoning in a cognitive robot architecture. For this purpose, we propose a cognitive architecture in which an agentic LLM serves as the core component for planning and reasoning, while components for working and episodic memories support learning from experience and adaptation. An instance of the architecture is then used to control a mobile manipulator in a simulated household environment, where environment interaction is done through a set of high-level tools for perception, reasoning, navigation, grasping, and placement, all of which are made available to the LLM-based agent. We evaluate our proposed system on two household tasks (object placement and object swapping), which evaluate the agent's reasoning, planning, and memory utilisation. The results demonstrate that the LLM-driven agent can complete structured tasks and exhibits emergent adaptation and memory-guided planning, but also reveal significant limitations, such as hallucinations about the task success and poor instruction following by refusing to acknowledge and complete sequential tasks. These findings highlight both the potential and challenges of employing LLMs as embodied cognitive controllers for autonomous robots.

Paper AI Chat

この論文のPDF全文を対象にAIに質問できます。

質問の例:

AIチャット機能を利用するには、ログインまたは会員登録(無料)が必要です。

会員登録 / ログイン

💬 ディスカッション

ディスカッションに参加するにはログインが必要です。

ログイン / アカウント作成 →

関連するAIDB記事